Showing posts with label freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freedom. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 4, 2024

Buzzsprout

Listen on Buzzsprout, Click here:

Battle For America, Tyranny or Liberty?


 

Southern Sense is conservative talk with Annie "The Radio Chick-A-Dee" Ubelis, and Curtis "CS" Bennett, co-host.

We're informative, fun, irreverent and, politically incorrect.  You never know where we'll go, but you'll love the journey!

 

Guests:

  • Mat Clark, author of "The Founding Fathers. What Did They Really Say?: Evidence that the US was founded on God & Christian principles"
  • Tom DeWeese is one of the nation’s leading advocates of individual liberty, free enterprise, private property rights, personal privacy, back-to-basics education and American sovereignty and independence. He is President of the American Policy Center, www.americanpolicy.org.

Dedication: To the brave 102 men, women and children who sailed on the Mayflower in 1620 to the New World, and to the signers of the Mayflower Compact.  This Compact gave birth to our Constitution that guarantees us our freedom, liberty and rights against tyranny.

Get full access to Annie’s Substack at southernsense.substack.com/subscribe (https://southernsense.substack.com/su...)

Trump, Elections, Constitution, Liberty, Freedom, News, Politics, 

Friday, April 30, 2021

What Constitution? Do We Even Have Law And Order? 04/30 by Southern Sense Talk Radio | Politics Conservative

What Constitution? Do We Even Have Law And Order? 04/30 by Southern Sense Talk Radio | Politics Conservative

Southern Sense is conservative talk with Annie "The Radio Chick-A-Dee" Ubelis, and Jani, co-host. Informative, fun, irreverent and politically incorrect, you never know where we'll go, but you'll love the journey! Southern-Sense 

Guests:

Larry Klayman, author of It Takes a Revolution: Forget the Scandal Industry! , is founder and former chairman of the successful non-profit foundation Judicial Watch, and current chairman of Freedom Watch. 

Mary Bawden, founder of Dance Awareness: No Child Exploited 

Fred Lucas is the Chief National Affairs Correspondent for The Daily Signal. 

Jonathan Butcher is the Will Skillman Fellow in Education at The Heritage Foundation. Keeping Racist Critical Race Theory Ideology Out of K-12 Classrooms. 

Dedication: To 33 fallen Law Enforcement Officers, who died in the line of duty from COVID-19

Sunday, June 10, 2018

We Need Your Prayers, TODAY


Friends,

Today, I call upon your prayers and ask you spread this message, as far and wide as possible, and ask to those you send it to, do the same.

At stake tomorrow, is the very Religious Liberty and property of our Church,The Parish Church of St. Helena, part of the Anglican Church of North America.  Back in the 1960's we were part of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina became part of The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America (TEC) and entered into a Trust with them, involving our property.  In that trust, was a clause that, should we find the need to remove ourselves from the Episcopal Church, we could do so and retain our property placed in trust.  Certain, doctrines were established as common beliefs based firmly upon the Gospel and fundamental Church teachings and laws in this union.

Our leaders, in this disassociation, joined in the Anglican Church of North America (ACNA) have remained true to the teachings of Our Lord Jesus, the tenets and disciplines of the Holy Gospel.  The Episcopal Church (TEC), has drifted away, following the outright violations and disregard of those very teachings, tenets and disciplines.  Since TEC no longer reflect the values we embrace, it was time to activate that clause in the Trust, which we did.

That action resulted in a law suit, demanding we immediately turn our properties, our very Churches, Homes, Graveyards and Retreats to TEC.  We have fought a valiant fight and the case went before the SC Supreme Court.  One SC Supreme Court Justice with direct and intimate ties with TEC, did not recuse herself, thus the court ruled against us.  However, we persevered and got a stay of action and brought the case to the United States Supreme Court, requesting they hear our case.

This fight has become so vicious, that a Bishop of the TEC has taken it to the gutter.  She was overheard stating that she would rather she our Church, The Parish Church of St. Helena, established since 1712, turned into a mosque.  Pray for us!

We ask for your prayers.  We ask that you make this issue go viral.  We ask for you love and support.  If we fail in this effort, then they will work furiously to suppress our religious liberty and our voices.

If we fall, then precedent set here will allow other religious groups to suppress more conservative members by threat and intimdation of taking their property, and places of worship.

But, in the words of  Luke 12:35-40 (ESV)

We Must Be Ready

35 “Stay dressed for action[a] and keep your lamps burning, 36 and be like men who are waiting for their master to come home from the wedding feast, so that they may open the door to him at once when he comes and knocks. 37 Blessed are those servants[b] whom the master finds awake when he comes. Truly, I say to you, he will dress himself for service and have them recline at table, and he will come and serve them. 38 If he comes in the second watch, or in the third, and finds them awake, blessed are those servants! 39 But know this, that if the master of the house had known at what hour the thief was coming, he[c] would not have left his house to be broken into. 40 You also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect.”

So, while, we may in reality lose all, we must stay true and strong in faith.  Your prayers, love and support by spreading this message will go a long way in helping us in Spirit and joy.

Thank you. May God bless and protect you . - Ann Ubelis




This past Thursday, June 7th, SCOTUS heard arguments for placing the case on their docket.  Tomorrow, June 11, 2018, they will rule as to if we will have a final day in court.  The link to the LIVE podcast, which starts at 9:30am EDT is below.

 Supreme Court LIVE Feed for June 11, 2018 - Click here

If the link doesn't work, copy and paste:

http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_orders_and_opinions__June_11_2018

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

What is the Truth behind Political Islam

Podcast here:

Truth Behind Political Islam with Dr. Bill Warner and Dr. Herb London

Dedication: Deputy Sheriff Kenneth Hubert Maltby, Eastland County Sheriff's Office, TX
EOW: Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Southern Sense is conservative talk Annie "The Radio Chick" Ubelis, as host and "CS" Bennett, co-host.  Informative, fun, irreverent and politically incorrect, you never know where we'll go, but you'll love the journey! 

Visit our website at http://www.Southern-Sense.com

Guest: Bill Warner holds a PhD in physics and math, NC State University, 1968. He has been a university professor, businessman, and applied physicist.
He was a Member of the Technical Staff in solid-state physics at the Sarnoff Princeton Laboratories in the area of integrated circuit structures. During the energy crisis of the 80’s he founded and ran a company that specialized in energy efficient homes. For eight years he was a professor at Tennessee State University in the Engineering School.

Dr. Warner has had a life-long interest in religion and its effects on history. He has studied the source texts of the major religions for decades. Even before the destruction of the World Trade Center he had predicted the war between Islam and America. The day after 9/11 he decided to make the source texts of Islam available for the average person. PoliticalIslam.com

Guest: Dr. Herb London, is president of the London Center for Policy Research and the co-author of the new book, The Encyclopedia of Militant Islam.
londoncenter.org  TWITTER: @TheLCPR

 

Friday, July 1, 2016

Faith & Freedom are at stake in America! What will you do?





Christians have been blamed for Islamist Jihadist attacking the
Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida.  Christians have been blamed for
the September 11, 2012 attacks in Benghazi, for arousing Islamist's
outrage.

Yet, oddly all of the violence has been perpetrated by Islamist
Jihadists with the victims being innocent Americans, be they Christian,
Jewish or members of the LBGT community.




One man speaks out with his heart in proudly proclaiming his
Conservative Christian roots with his latest album release, "Songs of
Faith".




Award winning Country Music Star Doug Briney joins Annie, of
Southern sense LIVE.  Catch the podcast here as the talk music, today's
events and their faith.


http://www.blogtalkradio.com/southernsense/2016/07/01/faith-freedom-with-country-music-star-doug-briney


We need to restore Faith & Freedom to America.  Join the joyous proclamations!

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Will you help advance the fight or sit home?

This coming Tuesday, May 7th our battle to advance the Conservative Cause in the US House of Representatives continues with the Special Election in South Carolina District 1.  The candidates are Democrat Elizabeth Colbert-Busch and Republican Mark Sanford.  The decision should be clear, but the waters have been muddied by main stream media and political pundits.

There is no reason the Libertarians, Independents, Conservatives and Republicans shouldn't get behind Mark Sanford, but we seem to need to bring Republicans to the polls kicking and screaming.  Let's see if we can calm these temper tantrums and speak logically and bring it down to six main points, they are:

  1. Mark Sanford did not get the support of the National Republican Congressional Committee which dates back to 1866.  This first and foremost should be the reason we must support and vote for him.  He is not a Washington insider, but he knows Washington as well as they do and they fear him.  He makes the RINO's (Republican In Name Only) apocalytic! He will make enemies, but when he joins forces with Mick Mulvaney and Trey Goudy, they will weld a powerful block of power on behalf of the 1st District in Congress.
  2. Mark Sanford has garnered the endorsement of Rand Paul and other conservative leaders and groups.
  3. Mark Sanford has a proven track record as a fiscal conservative.  He angered the RINO's in the State House by challenging them to cut pork from the state budget by showing up with the two piglets "Pork" and "Barrel".  Yes, it was a publicity stunt, but he poignantly got the point across.  You have to love his originality and courage to buck the "Old Boy's Network".  His ability to tangle with the RINOs in this state's Congress helped South Carolina rein in a runaway budget and enact state legislation to prevent and hinder Federal intrusion.  It speaks volumes.
  4. Yes, Ethic Violations were leveled against Governor Sanford.  However, he publicly stated, that in line with his fiscal conservative policy, he would not fight the charges, in order to save the State the cost of a trial and to avoid unnecessary extended publicity.  The charges were neither proven or disproved.  Which would you have preferred? A protracted drawn out public media circus over a trial  at great taxpayer expense? Or a swift end of the incident with repayment of all budget expenses and fines, which enabled our elected officials to continue to concentrate of the budget and pending legislation.
  5. Yes, Mark Sanford had an affair. If having an affair was criminal, half of the married couples would find their spouse in jail.  He has been compared to Bill Clinton by his opponent who inferred he should have been impeached.  We are talking apples and oranges.  Mark Sanford sinned, but he did not commit a crime.  Bill Clinton, not only sinned, he committed a crime. President Clinton was impeached for the criminal act of lying under oath.  He was found guilty of perjury.  Mark Sanford did not perjured himself.  He did not commit a crime. He has been out spoken, honest and repentant about the incident.
  6. Recently, charges were leveled against Mark Sanford of violating an order of protection issued to his wife against him preventing him from entering her home.  The incident centered around he escorting his son home on Superbowl Sunday at Half-Time.  Rather than leave his son home alone because his wife was out of time, he attempted to call her on his cell and remained so his son would not be at home, alone watching the game.  Now tell me, who has not had difficult relationships and break-ups?  Divorces are nasty and messy.  Often innocent events get grossly blown out of proportion.  That said, an even more serious question should be asked.  Who violated a court order that sealed the document?  Who committed a crime to publicly expose the incident to derail Mark Sanford's campaign? Why is this crime not being investigated and the culprit brought to justice?
The Progressives are watching this race closely.  Nancy Pelosi has poured funds into Elizabeth Colbert-Busch's campaign in the tune of over $300,000, yet Mrs. Busch claims she will be independent.  Nancy Pelosi has already begun her campaign to regain the Speakers Chair.  For those who say they cannot vote for Mark Sanford, remember this, if you fail to vote then you have helped cast a vote for Colbert-Busch and thus aided Nancy Pelosi in her agenda.

The final question is, if a Nation can forgive Bill Clinton his sins and re-elect him to a second term, then what is stopping us for forgiving Mark Sanford his sins and making him work hard for the Conservative issues?

I for one am voting this Tuesday, will you and help us retain the House of Representatives?

Friday, April 5, 2013

Why I won't support Gay Marriage - Don't get angry yet, read on!

Have you read the 1st Amendment to our Constitution, the Supreme Law of our land?  If not, I'll help you (forgive the sarcasm):

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Notice, please the section in RED.  I shall reiterate "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; (of religion).

Now, I'll explain, simply Marriage is a RELIGIOUS RITE, not a governmental function.  CIVIL UNIONS, of which you receive a "Marriage License, which in fact is a CIVIL UNION CERTIFICATE" is governments function.

Simply put, Marriage is Religious.

Civil Unions are Government recognized and subject to all of the rights, benefits and legal ramifications that can not and must not fall under a religious ceremony/rite.

Couples may and do CIVILLY UNITE outside of religious institutions.  Couples unite outside of GOVERNMENT SANCTIONS and are prohibited from receiving the benefits, which the Rainbow League claims to be fighting for.  They unite BY CHOICE for various and inconceivable reasons. They also marry outside of religious institutions - The Civil license which you purchase, that document you get at town hall!  A civil contract between two people to share their lives, assets, child & pet custody.

Marriage is a Religious Rite, where two people agree to unite their souls, hearts and lives under the eyes of God within their Church, Temple, Mosque or Shrine.  One is spiritual - Marriage, the other legal - Civil Unions.

This is the heart of the Gay Marriage issue.  The overthrow of religions and the implementation of government authority over God.

They are attempting to force us to accept the Marriage in place of the Civil Union recognition.  By altering state laws and federal laws, Civil Unions as each state recognizes covers the inheritance benefits of ALL COUPLES, regardless of sexual preference.  The local license issued to recognize that union should be proof enough.  It is not.  By redefining Marriage, you redefine all religions and place them now under government control and regulation.

The calling for Marriage alters the definition BY LAW of a religious rite.  In effect, they redefine a religion by telling all religions what a Marriage is by law.  Therefore, if a religion  recognizes same sex unions as unacceptable in the eyes of God, but is tolerant in society, government has the power to FORCE them to perform same sex marriage.  They can dictate and police your chosen religion!

If you think I am wrong, look to New Jersey, where a Christian organization denied a same sex couple access to their property so they may be married.  A Judge ruled in favor of the couple, stating that social justice must trump religious belief.  This is wrong not only in it's violation of the 1st Amendment which I quoted at the beginning of this rant, but also violated property rights.  Government can now tell you what activities can and can not be performed on your private property.  Finally, what about free speech, to vocally debate ANY issue without penalty?

I do not hate gays/lesbians or anyone else.  I do object when they attempt overtake my religion by imposing their dictates and mores.  It is not just Christianity, of which I am a proud member, but Judaism, Islam and all others, for which I speak.  They should also speak out & NOW!

Government has no business in defining a religions belief, they have no Constitutional basis in defining marriage.  The LEGAL recourse is the recognition of Civil Unions.  If a religion DOES recognize same sex unions, then THEY can perform that marriage, just don't demand my church does so! 

So, I say, what about you?

 

Monday, July 4, 2011

OMG! July 4th Patriotic Celebrations create more Republicans!

July 4th patriotic celebrations create more Republicans, Harvard study warns - latimes.com

How ironic, on this weekend the 235th birthday of these United States of America, that Progressives attempt to steal and squash the spirit that gave rise to this great Nation! Oh shame upon those God Loving, Gun Toting Patriotic Americans! How dare they respond by practicing good moral principles, strong conservative family values and love this Republic built upon the Constitution!

How horrible that Pomp and Circumstance elicit pride in self-reliance, freedom and independence, not of just the Nation, but of the individual!

Well all of you horrible Republicans, you Right-Wing nut job Conservatives, you Racist Tea-Baggers, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!

Keep on brainwashing your children by taking them to July 4th Parades, picnics and Fireworks!

Keep on teaching them to love God and Country! How dare you!

Keep on teaching them your core moral and family values! Don't worry, we'll change that when they hit colleges like Harvard!

Keep it up! You'll be sorry! You'll only create another Ronald Reagan or Margaret Thatcher!

Sunday, May 15, 2011

PRESIDENTIAL POWER GRAB - ALL HAIL KING OBAMA!

PRESIDENTIAL POWER GRAB
We need to call, email or FAX members of the US Senate and protest an upcoming bill. 

S 679 is titled:
Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011


This bill removes from the Senate the power to vote their consent for Senior Government Appointments, placing in the Office of the President powers contrary to those accorded in the Constitution.  While it is tacit that the process to name and approve these appointments needs to be streamlined, it should not be upon the backs of our rights and freedoms declared in the United States Constitution.

The Constitution's Appointment Clause reads:

"... shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."


The Heritage Foundation wrote in a recent article the following:

"The Senate Should Preserve, But Speed Up, Its Role in Senior Presidential Appointments

When the delegates of the states gathered in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 and wrote the Constitution, they distributed the powers of the federal government among two Houses of Congress, a President, and a judiciary, and required in many cases that two of them work together to exercise a particular constitutional power. That separation of powers protects the liberties of the American people by preventing any one officer of the government from aggregating too much power.
The Framers of the Constitution did not give the President the kingly power to appoint the senior officers of the government by himself. Instead, they allowed the President to name an individual for a senior office, but then required the President to obtain the Senate's consent before appointing the individual to office. Thus, they required the cooperation of the President and the Senate to put someone in high office.

Many of the Framers had practical experience with government and recognized that not every office would be of sufficient authority and consequence as to merit the attention of both the President and the Senate to an appointment to the office. Therefore, they provided a means by which the Congress by law could decide which of the lesser offices of government could be filled by the President alone, a court, or a department head."
 
By removing these offices from the Senate consent process, they diminish the power of the Senate and increase the power and role of the Presidency, further reducing the Checks and Balances set up by our Founding Fathers in the Constitution.  Furthermore, S 679 does not determine if the offices named in the bill are of "little or no consequence".  Rather, it deems that because the Senate is too slow, the sponsors feel that they should streamline the process and bypass the Senate Confirmation process. 

Now wouldn't it make more sense that if speeding up the process of appointments, then the Senate shouldn't the Senators review their internal process and look to modify it?  Also, the Executive Branch  should look internally at their own procedures in an effort to streamline the vetting process which has become over-burdensome and invasive as it travels through the federal bureaucracy before reaching the Senate. 

As usual, this legislation uses a sledgehammer to fix a problem, when a Love-Tap is more appropriate.  Legislation should not be necessary to "mandate" that the President tell his staff to cut the layers of bureaucracy, communicate with other departments and agencies (You know - Play nice boys!), nor to tailor the vetting process to the needs of the actual job the appointment is being made.  The "Working Group"created under the Executive Branch and appointed directly by the President not only is an additional power grab, but another layer of bureaucracy we can ill afford and a relinquishment of powers conferred upon Congress by the Constitution.

** More than 200 positions will be affected - this is a sampling of some of the Appointments to be directly under the Power of the President:
  • The Agriculture Department's Commodities Credit Board
  • Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service Administrator
  • The Chief Scientist of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • The Commerce Department's Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information
  • The Defense Department's Assistant Secretary for Networks and Information Integration
  • The Assistant Secretaries of each of the armed services for financial management
  • The Education Department's Assistant Secretary for Management
  • Education's Commissioner of Education Statistics
  • All 7 of the Assistant Secretaries of Energy
  • The Department of Homeland Security's Director of the Office of Domestic Preparedness
  • Homeland Security's Assistant Administrator of FEMA for Grant Programs
  • The Department of the Treasury's Assistant Secretary for Management and Chief Financial Officer
  • The Treasurer of the United States
  • Director of the US Mint
  • The Governors and Alternate Governors of the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (amending Section 3 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act)
  • Governor and Alternate Governor of the Asian Development Bank (amending Section 3(a) of the Asian Development Bank Act)
  • Governor and Alternate Governor of the African Development Fund (amending Section 203(a) of the African Development Fund Act)
  • Managing Director of the Corporation for National and Community Service
  • The Office of Management and Budget's Controller, Office of Federal Financial Management
  • Director of the Community Development Financial Institution Fund
 If this doesn't scare you?  How about this fact - The bill sponsor is Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and includes Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) as co-sponsor.  The following Republicans also signed onto S 679:
Alexander (TN)
Brown (MA)
Collins (ME)
Johanns (NE)
Kyl (AZ)
Lugar (IN)
McConnell (KY)

Hot Air also has a good article on this boondoggle! Read it here! 


VOTE NO!

ON S 679 AND ANY COMPANION BILLS THAT WILL DIMINISH THE POWER OF CONGRESS AND INCREASE THE POWER ACCORDED TO THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE BRANCH.